×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Livermore Draft General Plan 2045

The General Plan lays out the community’s vision for how our City will look, feel, and change over the next 20 years. Since 2021, we’ve been engaging with the community. Your input has formed the foundation of Draft General Plan 2045. This tool collected community feedback from February 20, 2026 through April 20, 2026. You can continue to  share feedback via email (GPUpdate@LivermoreCA.gov) and at upcoming public meetings. Please visit https://imaginelivermore2045.org/get-involved/ for more information. 

 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Full Document
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Commenting is closed for this document.

flutefreak Apr 18 2026 at 1:28PM on page 69

Suggestion
Having a safe way to bike or walk across 580 would be essential for the connection to the rest of livermore.

Jordan Reid Mar 18 2026 at 5:57PM on page 33

Question
I don't see any information about the significant changes made to the "Laughlin Road Focus Area" in this GP draft. Changing this High Density Residential (HDR1) and General Industrial (GI) next to an established low density residential neighborhood creates unintended impacts for current residents. Please follow up with me as I don't see any information on this significant land use change.

Erik Feb 24 2026 at 1:30PM on page 33

Why is this area high density res? Our neighborhood went to all the workshops and we were told that this would remain open space! But this map shows it in brown and it is the largest brown area on the map. This is unacceptable to just change land use with the input of all the home owners! The city lied!

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:31PM on page 148

Suggestion
While I am not a huge fan of these autonomous technologies, I can see the value of providing a "last mile" connection to underserved and low density areas. I would prefer funding be prioritized towards fixed-route transit and other multi-modal projects.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:29PM on page 142

Suggestion
Very glad to see the reduction of Off-street parking mandates as we want to maximize the usage of the land we already have with denser and more effective uses.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:27PM on page 129

Suggestion
I hope to see the city supporting increased funding for Transit and helping prioritize lines in areas which are underserved by transit such as the 20X and 11 lines which have very limited frequency and cover important future development corridors such as the Midtown specific plan, First st corridor and Brisa neighborhood.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:24PM on page 128

Suggestion
Very excited to see Valley Link be built, I hope that Livermore does whatever it can in its power to help support this project.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:20PM on page 123

Suggestion
I am highly supportive of increasing the throughput of existing alternative modes of transport so that its efficient to travel without a car. I hope that more signal priority or possibly even bus lanes may be considered in high bus traffic corridors to help reduce VMT. Very excited to see such policies considered.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:16PM on page 75

Suggestion
While I understand the need for open space preservation, I feel that expansion into the East of Greenville area would open up important economic opportunities for the industrial uses which may be displaced by the Midtown specific plan. I would hope that Livermore maintains its expansive industrial base and continues to be a valuable and thriving area for industrial uses. I am confident that any expansions into this area will be carefully considered and further expansion into the hills will be mitigated.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:10PM on page 50

Suggestion
Yes! Missing middle and residential density are so vital to helping solve the housing crisis in the bay area. I sincerely hope that these policies are supported and implemented to the fullest so that we may sustainably grow Livermore for the future.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 4:09PM on page 46

Suggestion
I am so happy to see transit oriented development, density, and mobility being placed as important policies.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 3:52PM on page 40

Suggestion
So glad to see ancillary uses of retail being explicitly mentioned in the Office district as its very commonly seen but has to often be added as an exception to the existing purely industrial designation.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 3:51PM on page 39

Suggestion
Very exciting to see limited residential be allowed in these common commercial districts, this may provide an exciting opportunity for more housing in desirable commercial areas.

Evren Yuncuoglu Feb 21 2026 at 3:50PM on page 38

Suggestion
Huge fan of this new designation, going to be very helpful and I'm so glad it no longer has the odd PD requirement that the General Plan Designation for these uses had previously.
View all